Math was created to solve problems not to complete redundant worksheets.
Jan. 28, 2012
Math was created to solve problems not to complete redundant worksheets.
Jan. 28, 2012
I’ve been reading more and more criticism about Apple’s announcement on January 19. The critics are the pundits – those well respected names in the educational reform/tech world. The criticisms vary, but focus on a few similar themes:
I agree with all of it. They are, of course, correct in their assessment. Apple didn’t revolutionize education, the tools work only on iPads, the copyright rules are ridiculous, and there are no social tools.
But does that make the announcement a failure? Not in my mind.
The education tech/reform thought leaders don’t live in my world. While I wish what they wanted would happen, my world is years behind. Not only are the schools I see not ready to move away from textbooks, they aren’t ready to move to digital textbooks. They aren’t ready for the cloud. They don’t see the need or advantage of using technology. They see only the problems with digital: too expensive, too complicated, they’d have to teach differently, the kids would cheat, etc. These schools aren’t ready to move away from the teacher as the expert. They aren’t ready to allow other forms of assessment (to be fair, their hands are tied by NCLB.) They don’t see the need to teach students about digital literacy. They are afraid the students know more than they do.
(I will be flamed for criticizing teachers. I am not doing that. I am criticizing a system that doesn’t not empower teachers to look for new tools. A system that rewards test scores, not creativity. )
This is the world I see:
You see? This is the world I see every day as a parent. I spend my days reading the writings of thought leaders, talking to teachers all over the country (via social media, reading their blogs, etc.) about the innovative things they are doing with iPads, social media, BYOD, etc. Then, I go into my kids’ schools and to teacher trainings and see something totally different. It’s frustrating for me, and I know it’s frustrating for teachers and schools to have one more thing thrown at them.
That’s why I think the Apple announcement is a big deal.
I have the utmost respect and admiration for the thought leaders in the education reform /ed tech area. I read their blogs daily. I have learned so much from them. I am convinced that they are laying the path for where education has to go.
But, I would like to invite them to come to my world. I also have a ton of respect and admiration for the teachers I encounter daily. Their plates are already full, and we’re asking them to totally change how they do their job. Come talk to the teachers I talk to. Have them help the teachers I train learn how to find a wireless network. Teach them that there are different browsers – the Internet Explorer isn’t the internet. Model the new tools to the teachers and to the students. Show them positive uses of technology tools. Help them feel comfortable with a new look at education.
The real world is far behind. I’m hoping Apple’s announcement is a small step towards validating the new educational reality.
I watched Apple’s announcement with great interest. The expectation was that this announcement would “revolutionize” education.
That’s a pretty tough expectation. Unrealistic. And Apple didn’t revolutionize education.
I’ve read plenty of criticism of the announcement.
Audrey Watters was totally unimpressed. She wanted the revolution. She quoted Phil Schiller, “ It’s the same great content we’ve always had in textbooks, Phil Schiller said onstage today, just in a new digital format.” For Audrey, that’s the problem. She doesn’t want textbooks. She has a compelling argument. She feels that primary source material is easily available now and teachers can compile it themselves.
In theory, I totally agree. In my first teaching job (7-8th grade social studies), there were no textbooks. I was allowed to create my own class, totally from scratch – including topic, sources, assignments, outcomes. It would’ve been a great opportunity – except I was 24 years old and had never taught before. I’d LOVE to have that opportunity now. I was in no way prepared for it then. We did end up with a pretty good class, somehow.
Most schools don’t run that way – wish they did. It would take more than a revolution in education to get states out of the business of selecting texts. It would take way more money to pay teachers fair pay for developing curriculum.
Beyond that, Audrey Watters and others complain that Apple’s products are proprietary – they work only on iPads. That the EULA is restrictive. That the “interactive” features are really only frosting, they are just the same type of teaching, just with bells and whistles. There is not social feature in any of the tools introduced.
All these things are true.
But I still think the announcement is a big deal. Why? Because it pushes mainstream digital publishers to recognize that digital texts are reality. It brings these ideas into everybody’s attention. Apple is much more of a household name than Inkling. It’ll take Apple to get school administrators, teachers, parents and students to take this seriously – even if they don’t have iPads.
Most schools aren’t anywhere near ready to abandon textbooks. Jumping to a digital textbook is enough of a revolution. For the schools that are lucky enough to already have iPads, this really is a great deal. It’s a great first step until the software and books mature.
The iBooks Author tool will be another step towards moving away from textbooks – it’ll let teachers (and students!) see that they can collect, curate and deliver content.
Things will evolve. It’s only a matter of time until Apple gets the pressure to have iBooks Author publish to other formats – or someone else will figure it out. The copyright issue will have to change. iTunes U will have to add some social features.
While this may not be a revolution, it’s a great first step!
Quote from one of my favorite ed tech leaders, Chris Lehmann:
There is no reason to assume that kids have to use the same tools they used back in the 1950s. In fact to do so is to prepare them for a world that has already passed.
Apple used this quote in their big announcement today. Go Chris!
You can even see this great quote posted at the event.
Sometimes I get frustrated as a parent. Not with my kids – but with the schools. I have spent the last year studying the impact of appropriate integration of technology in education. The results are overwhelmingly positive. Schools must move in that direction.
I try to talk with my kids’ schools. It is slow going. Obviously, they are the experts, and I certainly can’t jump in and tell them what to do. Yet, I also am responsible for my kids’ education and I have the right to speak up.
I think I’ve been respectful. I try to educate and inform. Yet, I feel like the schools really don’t want me involved. I see some movement, not much. Maybe I just want more action and faster. To me, it’s very obvious that incorporating the technology is a huge benefit, and I want it to happen now. Not at the school’s pace.
Saw this blog post today by The Tempered Radical. Basically, he’s frustrated with not having access to technology. Can’t say that I blame him. I do appreciate his comment about not criticizing his teaching when he has no access to technology.
I may try to change how I approach this. No longer will I be critical of them not using technology. I will ask how I can help them get technology and incorporate technology. I just ask their respect in return that when I ask about using technology in the classroom not to look at me like I’m crazy and stupid.
For the last couple of days, my daughter and I have been weighing the good and bad points about taking an AP World History class. It seems like everywhere I turn, the signs are against it.
I guess it depends on your values and what you think matters. Whenever I ask the school, it’s all about getting kids ready for COLLEGE. OK, yes, that is valid. But truly, is that it? Is that all that high school is for? for COLLEGE? Are colleges really that myopic that they only want kids who do the traditional academic course? Is college admission and prep really all there is?
What about LIFE? Isn’t that more of a goal? What does the traditional AP type course really prepare you for? Reading heavy tomes of content and spitting it back on a test? Let me think how many times since college that I’ve taken a test. That would be ZERO. Never. Not once. How many times have I made a presentation? Many. How many times could I present information in ways besides a test? Always.
Which brings me to this great video about creativity that I ran across today. I’m just not sure rushing through a ton of content to spit it back is worth it. Take more time. Be creative. That will likely take you further.